The sentencing proceedings involving Bellarmine Chatunga Mugabe and his co-accused Tobias Matonhodze took a serious turn at the Alexandra Regional Court, where new details raised concerns beyond the compensation already paid to the victim.
While the court heard that Sipho Mahlangu has received financial compensation totaling R400,000, attention quickly shifted to a troubling issue — the firearm used in the shooting remains missing.
Investigators revealed that despite extensive searches at a Hyde Park property, the weapon could not be found. Police deployed K9 units, combed through the premises, and even searched a swimming pool using magnets due to poor visibility, but came up empty-handed.
The State argued that both accused have failed to assist in locating the firearm and have shown no willingness to cooperate. Authorities warned the court that the weapon is still functional and could pose a danger if it remains in circulation.
Although the defence suggested that someone else may have removed the firearm during the chaos after the incident — when security personnel and paramedics were present — prosecutors insisted the responsibility still lies with the accused.
The case has drawn significant public attention, and the State made it clear it is seeking tough penalties.
For Mugabe, prosecutors are pushing for direct imprisonment linked to firearm offences and immigration violations. Meanwhile, Matonhodze faces the possibility of a much harsher sentence, including years behind bars for attempted murder, illegal possession of a firearm and ammunition, and defeating the ends of justice.
In contrast, the defence is advocating for a more lenient outcome, proposing fines and suspended sentences while highlighting the personal circumstances of both men.
With the victim appearing to have recovered and even attending court voluntarily, the focus now rests on the court’s final decision.
Proceedings have been postponed to April 29, when sentencing is expected to be concluded after the court carefully weighs all arguments and legal considerations.