You may also hearken to this podcast on iono.fm here.
This transcript is a translation from the unique interview, which was carried out in Afrikaans and aired on RSG Geldsake, right here.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: Nedbank just lately revealed its fifth Nedbank Private Giving Report. It’s a report that appears on the philanthropic behaviour of South Africans. It analyses how rich South Africans give of their time and money to sure establishments and how their behaviour has modified over the previous few years. The analysis was compiled from interviews carried out with greater than 400 rich people. It discovered that these people donated R4.2 billion final 12 months in money, in addition to R2.6 billion in providers and items, and 3.2 million hours of their time to welfare organisations.
That was sadly considerably less than in 2020, and the examine ascribes this drop to the monetary penalties of the pandemic. The analysis additionally discovered that the worth of particular person donations was decrease and that people on common donated less than R10 000.
Read: SA’s rich donated R6.8bn to needy causes in 2021
The analysis additionally checked out various topics, why these people would in truth open their wallets, their causes for doing so, which establishments acquired a lot of the money, and how these people recognized the establishments to which they then donate their time, money, items and providers.
Hein Klee, head of International at Nedbank Private Wealth in South Africa is on the road. He will chat with us from Windhoek, of all locations. Hein, a heat welcome to the programme. Let’s start with a definition of a ‘wealthy individual’ or a ‘high net worth individual’ as you describe such an individual within the analysis. How a lot money should one must qualify?
HEIN KLEE: Good afternoon, Ryk. It’s good and heat right here in Windhoek and a pleasure to speak with you. As you talked about, that is the fifth report. With the primary report in 2010 we requested ourselves what we’d outline as somebody inside that classification. Well, we stated, on the outset we had been somebody incomes a minimal annual revenue of R1.5 million. Then we went on to have a look at the developments amongst folks with investable investments or asset values, let’s say, and we set a minimal of round R5 million. So these had been the 2 standards we checked out.
Our second report was the primary in South Africa for which we gave ourselves a complete information level the place we extra or less estimated that there have been about 148 000 people in South Africa who fitted inside these two classes.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: So one has to earn greater than R1 500 a 12 months, or principally have greater than R5 million in monetary belongings to fall inside this class. You say that there are about 148 000 – do these fall in South Africa? That truly sounds reasonably a small quantity if we think about that we now have a inhabitants of over 60 million. But what number of of these put their palms in their very own pockets and give money or time or merchandise and providers to charity?
HEIN KLEE: I believe you’re a hundred p.c right. I believe that group of individuals has shrunk, however what’s optimistic in reviews 4 and 5 is that our estimate is that about 83% of these indirectly or one other donate money or items – in addition to their time, in fact.
The pandemic we skilled gave us a optimistic indication that there’s not less than a steady stage of people who’re nonetheless donating, and we estimate that they comprise 83% of these.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: So 83% of rich folks in South Africa are giving money or different issues like time to charity. That sounds a big share. How does this evaluate with the odds in different nations?
HEIN KLEE: That’s an fascinating query. Of course, the examine we did was on people. That doesn’t embody organisations and firms. The pattern that I picked up was that there’s a very giant and rising market consisting of ‘giving’ or ‘philanthropic’ shoppers coming from Asia. And in fact, you might have your giant bases like England, Europe and the US. The indication there, we discovered, was that the worldwide pattern is for people to reasonably create a construction – in different phrases, a basis or a belief or the like – then by way of a belief or an organisation they create to give explicit quantities of money, time or items.
Interestingly in South Africa, of the 148 000 folks, whom we imagine to be in business, 409 whom we interviewed, solely 4% use any construction. Thus 96% of individuals simply give money or time; they don’t use a proper construction. So I believe the South African business, in relation to wealth and what folks donate, varies extensively with regard to what folks give on their very own, and they don’t actually make use of constructions to distribute the advantages they want to donate to organisations.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: I discover it fascinating that you’ve discovered that the typical particular person donates less than R10 000 a 12 months. If one thinks of an revenue of R1.5 million-plus, R10 000 appears like a drop within the ocean.
HEIN KLEE: You are completely proper. It’s additionally fascinating that that quantity we checked out had sadly declined from the quantities in our earlier reviews, which had been nearer to R50 000-R100 000. So what we actually really feel at this stage is that the person prefers to give one thing reasonably than nothing.
You have additionally touched on a vital level, one thing that we at Nedbank Private Wealth at present really feel very strongly about, which is to speak to folks, asking them what they assume the impression of their R10 000 or R50 000 donation can be. Wouldn’t or not it’s to your benefit to have a look at which organisations or people donate to comparable kinds of organisations – reminiscent of, say, training – and then create a ‘collective’ in order that R10 000 from 10 folks would have a a lot nice impression than R10 000, as a result of R100 000 would imply rather more than simply R10 000?
So it’s small, however we expect it’s as a result of we now have gone by way of a pandemic during which folks have turn into a little bit extra cautious. But, finally, it’s nonetheless a case of ‘I’m giving one thing reasonably than nothing’.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: Do you recognize if folks give spontaneously? Are they proactive or do many of those people give solely when somebody telephones them and says, “There are hungry children in a children’s home, please help” – and then they reply. Did you have a look at that?
HEIN KLEE: Interestingly we regarded on the main motivational spurs. The prime one amongst these we interviewed was on the finish of the day they stated “we care about the outcome of something”, or “we care about the cause”. That’s the most important. The second one is folks saying, “I want to make a difference”, and the third is what you coincidentally talked about: “Someone told me about someone in need, and that’s why I decided to donate money.” Those are actually the three large causes we got here throughout.
Another one which got here by way of that we additionally discovered fascinating is the sensation of eager to give again to my neighborhood. Many of these we interviewed on this report additionally advised us: “The money I am giving I would rather donate to my own community than to a major international institution. I want to make a change in my community, in my town, in my city, instead of having it go to a national organisation.”
RYK VAN NIEKERK: Now, how do people determine these organisations needing help of their native communities? Of course, they first must determine whom to donate to, and then they must donate. But the place do they discover out about these establishments?
HEIN KLEE: That’s fascinating. I believe the place this report was born in 2010 was as a result of a few of our shoppers got here to us and stated, “What should I do with this donation, where do I go?” I believe that’s the place the philanthropic providers of Nedbank Private Wealth come by way of so strongly. It’s that we now have specialists who will sit down with a consumer and say, “Very properly, the place do you assume you can also make a distinction? Is that with respect to feeding programmes, is it with respect to training, is it studying, is it a trainer after we give a scholar a bursary? So we then do particular analysis into organisations linked to what the consumer desires to do.
So I believe the opposite factor that usually occurs is that many organisations that do fundraising, in lots of circumstances inform a consumer that it’s good to help a fundraising effort, however what’s essential to us is that it’s essential to actually have an curiosity, it’s essential to develop alongside that organisation on the finish of the day. Don’t make it a once-off quantity. Spread it over a interval of three to 5 years. Become concerned in it. Ultimately that’s the place you will notice the R10 000 transfer as much as R100 000, and the R100 000 transfer as much as R1 million. It’s that sort of behaviour that we need to instill in shoppers.
But I believe fundraising is in fact the most important organisational useful resource, and naturally divisions inside banks like ours focus particularly on philanthropic providers to our shoppers.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: So you might have a division inside Nedbank Private Wealth that helps your wealthy and rich shoppers donate money to charity. How large is that this division?
HEIN KLEE: The division has existed for some years. Different organisations – as an illustration you’ll keep in mind Syfrets, the Board of Executors. Many shoppers come from these former firms. What we then do is we see philanthropic recommendation as an advisory element. It doesn’t function alone. What we finally do with a consumer is to say, okay, what do you want and the place do you need to go?
If I keep in mind, in line with our information we most likely have north of 300 shoppers contained in the philanthropic division, and if reminiscence serves our asset worth which particularly seems at that, and right here I’m referring to not the quantity donated to organisations, however to the asset worth – the final quantity that I checked out was I believe R9 billion which particularly resides inside our division for philanthropic providers.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: I assume most different wealth managers would even have such divisions?
HEIN KLEE: There are a number of opponents who I do know are trying into that. I believe what we’re doing otherwise is that you would be able to’t see it as a discrete product. The most essential factor we in fact have to debate with a lot of our shoppers is to ‘leave something in your will for an organisation close to you’ as a result of many organisations’ largest useful resource is somebody declaring in his will that 10% of his money should, as an illustration, go to animal welfare or training, and so forth. That’s a lot of our shoppers’ level of departure. We actually see that as an integral a part of our service to many purchasers.
We additionally in fact have many purchasers with out belongings of worth, however they are saying, “Okay, I do have money over at the end of the month that I would like to donate to charity”… That’s the place the Nedbank Affinity Programme has been working for some years the place we inform shoppers we now have the Affinity Programme that appears at sure sectors, and you may go to your checking account by way of an app and make a donation to Affinity. There are two parts Old Mutual the app that we’re actually driving in relation to giving money, providers or time for organisations.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: I’m chatting with Hein Klee, head of International at Nedbank Private Wealth in South Africa, concerning the just lately revealed fifth Nedbank Wealth Giving Report on South Africans’ philanthropic behaviour.
Hein, I’d [now] like to speak about time, the time that donate, as a result of I believe many individuals perceive that if you happen to give money, you give money and the establishment can use it because it sees match, however what does giving one’s time contain?
HEIN KLEE: I believe we’ve discovered that the time folks give revolves round serving to with feeding kids or feeding the homeless. We have seen many who give of their time to, say, assist kids with maths and bodily science in relation to further lessons. I believe we now have additionally seen, particularly in Natal with the floods and in fact the unrest, the rebuilding and the cleansing of streets, and so forth.
So it’s very tough to say how folks give of their time. We would identical to to see extra skilled folks giving their time free to those organisations, and what I’m referring to right here is that many of those organisations are in fact establishments that don’t pay tax, non-profit organisations, and they in fact have explicit necessities when it comes to finance. So an auditor, for instance, would possibly give a few of his time to maybe compile reviews for such organisations, as attorneys would possibly in relation to authorized facets when it comes to what they could or might not do.
So I believe that’s an space to which a little bit extra time may be given, however I believe probably the most time we see [being given] is of people that roll up their sleeves and become involved locally to assist many of those establishments that wants palms on the finish of the day.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: Yes, I believe the time {of professional} folks may be extremely, extremely beneficial to assist others.
The organisation Gift of the Givers, for instance, is an establishment that provides professionals the chance to give again to communities, as a result of then you may get medical doctors, engineers and the like to assist folks in want. These skilled persons are not paid for doing so, however if you happen to give a donation to the Gift of the Givers, that money is principally utilized for that objective. Is that the kind of mannequin to which you’re referring?
HEIN KLEE: Absolutely right. When the report was launched, we in fact had the privilege of getting the founding father of the organisation with us.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: Dr Imtiaz Sooliman.
HEIN KLEE: Right. That’s what it’s all about. What the physician additionally advised us is that ‘I’m getting a name proper now’. I don’t know if you happen to noticed that they had been very concerned within the Eastern Cape over the previous few days, near East London, round that space the place there have been a lot of fires, the place they abruptly needed to get helicopters, meals for the firefighters, and so forth. I believe that’s the place many imagine on the finish of the day they will become involved.
But I believe what typically occurs is folks volunteer their time to explicit organisations like the hearth service, the place fires and the like frequently happen within the Western Cape. So I believe these are varieties or organisations the place time is of the essence. The time of a further hand serving to is in lots of situations of the best asset – and in fact donations of meals, items, water for the hearth fighters and so on. I believe that’s what I referred to earlier.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: Are there explicit establishments which are extra fashionable than others, if I can put it like that, or that obtain extra donations as a result of they’re higher identified in South Africa and are properly revered, reminiscent of Gift of the Givers?
HEIN KLEE: I believe it’s a bit wider that only a identify. I believe it truly is round sectors. That’s what we picked up within the report, the place the most important element of giving money and changing into concerned is round social neighborhood growth. It is about uplifting society and the neighborhood. Of course, spiritual establishments had been one other space, training one other element, though it was regarding that this had declined some 10% – from 32% to 22%.
The different one which got here to the fore on this report was what folks had carried out relating to Covid-19 with regard to assist, time, and so forth. There is a big element across the setting; security and safety is one other. Sport, unusually sufficient, slid from 10% to 4%.
The largest rise we noticed within the report back to which individuals had been donating and the place there have been declines in sure sectors, was the 18% bounce in Covid-19 responses and the time and money round that.
It’s subsequently a tough query to reply in respect of organisations as such, as a result of the info we acquired from the report is extra when it comes to sectors than people, or particular person organisations.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: There are additionally sure monetary advantages for folks donating money to charitable organisations, and you may get a so-called 18A certificates from a registered organisation that you would be able to then use to scale back your tax legal responsibility. Do you see that many individuals donate money simply to obtain a tax profit later?
HEIN KLEE: A really fascinating query. Let me give a little bit of background. Every 12 months, simply earlier than we begin on the info and the analysis, we do what we name a calibration of the kinds of inquiries to be requested – the place we stand within the financial system, and if one thing has occurred, reminiscent of Covid-19. And what we determined on this report is to set an open query to ask what ought to change for me to give extra. One of the questions was round tax.
We talked about this earlier than. Among the 148 000 folks within the wealth class who had been fairly properly off, reminiscent of having high-income belongings, one would have thought that that tax certificates definitely performed an enormous function. It’s fascinating that of the 409 folks we interviewed not one gave a sign that for them a tax deduction determined the place they needed to go, and why they had been donating on the finish of the day.
So, in line with us, the tax profit isn’t an element in relation to how folks donate.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: That’s very fascinating. I additionally see that extra and extra girls open their palms – many greater than previously. So there are various extra girls who donate money. And I additionally see extra black folks donating money.
HEIN KLEE: Correct. It was the primary time within the report we did the place girls represented greater than 50% of ‘givers’, if I could put it like that. And I imagine the report gave us a sign of transformation within the South African financial system, even within the areas we regarded, the place 21% or 22% had been particular person black South African givers. That’s a reasonably large bounce.
Read: More rich girls leaning into philanthropy in SA, Giving Report exhibits
RYK VAN NIEKERK: If you stand again and have a look at the report, do you assume wealthy or rich South Africans have open palms?
HEIN KLEE: I believe they’ve. Ryk, the explanation I discussed it’s that within the report we regarded on the age distribution of individuals giving. From our perspective there are two varieties who give, not due to who they’re however how they might help. I’m talking of money donations.
You have somebody with a fairly large asset worth, and that particular person directs these belongings, dividends and curiosity, and so forth, in the direction of sure welfare organisations to which they donate.
Then there’s a second element, that of an individual who has money over the month-end after paying the whole lot, and feels it his obligation to donate money. You will discover that most individuals who’ve money over on the finish of the month are among the many youthful group. We’ve seen for the primary time that the age group between 35 and 50 has risen strongly. So we’re seeing the youthful guard now coming to the fore when it comes to the money and time they want to donate.
So from our perspective giving in South Africa may be very wholesome. As to the query you place to me earlier across the R10 000 and its decline, I believe Covid-19 had a big impact, however I imagine as for different elements like financial progress and the place we’re going, within the subsequent report in two years’ time I imagine we’re going to see a pattern as soon as once more lifting its head in relation to the quantities given on the finish of the day.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: To me it’s reasonably a small quantity, less than R1 000 a month for the highest 10%, and I hope it improves.
It can be fascinating to do a examine about individuals who earn less than R1.5 million – which in fact is a a lot, a lot higher group of individuals – and whether or not comparatively talking they give greater than these wealthy folks do. Are you conscious of such a examine?
HEIN KLEE: Not that I do know of. I do know that the report, the Giving Report that we do, is the one one in South Africa and in Africa. That is one thing that I’ll chat to the bosses about to see if there’s a approach for us to take this examine additional. We may have a look at, say, R750 000 to R1.5 million. The examine area can be a lot greater; in different phrases, the people with whom we have to do interviews would bounce from, say, the 409 that we checked out to a few thousand.
Ryk, I believe that’s undoubtedly one thing one may have a look at, as a result of I believe there most likely can be a really robust correlation. If we see it within the age group 36 to 50, we’d most likely additionally decide that up amongst folks with a decrease revenue stage. You would most likely discover that the quantity that they give could also be a little bit smaller, however that they certainly give on the finish of the day. But these small quantities, counted collectively, ultimately make an enormous distinction.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: Hein, thanks a lot for you time this night. It can be a very fascinating report and if we chat once more in two years’ time – since you announce this report each two years – the quantity may bounce from R10 000 to R50 000 as a result of our nation is so unequal. There is a lot want, and I typically assume the folks in South Africa that decide the perfect fruit and decide many of the fruit, can give again – not all the time by way of tax however direct to good establishments which are actually doing unbelievable work in South Africa.
HEIN KLEE: Ryk, I believe what can be essential is for listeners to go to our website… The report is accessible to obtain free. Why I point out that particularly is that we additionally requested a few specialists to put in writing sure articles for us round issues they discover within the present financial system which are actual strain factors. Four or 5 glorious articles have been written which I believe a lot of your listeners would additionally discover fascinating.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: Or one can Google the Nedbank Private Wealth Giving Report.
HEIN KLEE: All 5 can be found on the web site. That’s even higher. That can be one thing good to learn throughout December whereas on vacation.
RYK VAN NIEKERK: Thank you, Hein, to your time. That was Hein Klee, head of International at Nedbank Private Wealth.
