Just over a week ago, on Friday, 10 January, controversial conservative commentator, Candace Owens announced to the world that she had just received a “strongly-worded” lawyer’s letter from French President Emmanuel Macron, and his wife, Brigitte.
“This is something”, Owens pointed out, “that has probably never happened in the history of the world”; a citizen in one country…getting a lawyer’s letter from a sitting president of another country.
‘CONSPIRACY’ CANDACE OWENS
The letter was a legal threat demanding that Owens halt her investigation into France’s first lady, Brigitte.
Owens, no stranger to public attacks and lawsuits, has been prolific in blowing up the web lately, with a string of jaw-dropping, truth-bomb, analysis videos.
Over the past year alone she’s uncovered one untouchable “conspiracy theory” after another. From MK-Ultra (long before the recent reveal) and Project Blue Beam, to NASA’s satanic origins. From the Moon Landing to the manufactured histories of Obama and Kamala.
One of her more explosive exposés over the past eight months has been a deep-dive investigation into the history of Brigitte Macron.
Keep in mind, that these allegations could all be conjecture, speculation and hypothesis (based on substantial research by several reporters) and merely for your consideration.
HOW IT BEGAN
As Owens explains, it began early last year when she was browsing Daily Mail and came across an article reporting that Macron was furious over the “rumours” about his wife… being a man.
The article featured only two photos as “proof” that Brigitte Macron ever lived as a woman for the first 30 years of her life. What struck Owens about the first photo was the fact that Brigitte’s eight-year-old brother, Jean-Michel, looked exactly like Brigitte. Whereas, toddler Brigitte sitting on her mother’s lap, did not.
On a hunch, Owens decided to go and dig up the primary source. What she found shocked her.
A SURREAL STORY, THREE YEARS IN THE MAKING
She discovered that this was part of a story that had been researched and written over three years by two journalists, Xavier Poussard and Natacha Rey, and published as a six-part series in an independent investigative publication called Faits et Documents (Facts & Documents).
What the investigation allegedly revealed is that Brigitte Macron did not exist for the first 30 years of her life. Something, as Owens pointed out, that would be pretty easy to debunk – starting with a trove of photos of Brigitte as a child, teen and young woman. Or how about a few photos of Brigitte pregnant with one of her three children? Nope.
DID THE MACRONS THREATEN A JOURNALIST?
Instead, the Macrons apparently sent their Secret Service out to intimidate the journalists.
They got wind of the investigation when Natacha Rey interviewed a woman close to the Macrons and she informed them that a journalist was digging up the story.
The SS showed up at Rey’s home and detained her, intimidated her and confiscated her phone. They also demanded to know who else was working on the story. “This is simply not something you do when you are telling the truth”, Owens said.
A SECOND JOURNALIST THREATENED?
Natacha Rey was apparently not the only journalist targeted and intimidated by the Macrons and their SS. Another journalist, Emmanuelle Anizon from the Parisian mainstream magazine, Le Nouvel Obs, jumped on the story intending to debunk it. Problem is, she couldn’t. She too evidently received a visit from the SS.
Summed up, the journalists are alleging that Brigitte Macron was born and lived the first 30 years of her life as a biological male named Jean-Michel Trogneux.
In August 2024, Owens tracked down and interviewed the original journalist who wrote the six-part scoop for Faits et Documents, Xavier Poussard.
During the 40-minute interview, Poussard disclosed several jaw-dropping revelatory allegations about Brigitte Macron.
DID THEIR ‘ROMANCE’ BREAK THE LAW?
Jean-Michel Trogneux was born in 1945. His sister, Brigitte, was born in 1953 but died young in early 1961. From around 1984 onwards, Jean-Michel purportedly assumed the identity of his sister (whose death was undeclared, or erased) as he had access to her birth certificate, ID card and social security number.
The “official” story presented by the Macrons, and mainstream media, is that Emmanuel was 15 when they began their relationship, and Brigitte was 39. Poussard, however, insists that he was 14 and she was 47 when they became involved. If that’s true, and they were in a sexual relationship at the time, it’s statutory rape.
BRIGITTE’S CHILDREN AND (ABSENT) EX-HUSBAND
As for the children, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine, Poussard claims Jean-Michel fathered the children – born in 1975, 1977 and 1984 – with a woman named Brigitte Auzière, and wasn’t married to her at the time. Brigitte Auzière has since seemingly disappeared off the face of the earth. Poussard believes what happened to her is a well-kept secret in the family.
Then there’s the mysterious case of Brigitte’s “ghostly” reclusive ex-husband, André-Louis Auzière, who apparently died in December 2019 at the age of 69. His death was only announced nine months later. The retired banker ended his days in ‘the strictest privacy’, we’re told.
For a while, only one photo of André-Louis had seemingly been released to the public – of his and Brigitte’s supposed wedding in June 1974. Poussard maintains the woman in the photo is not Brigitte, and the groom is not Auzière.
Another photo surfaced of Auzière and Brigitte together later in life. Again, Poussard says it is not Andre Louis, but a teacher colleague of Brigitte’s named Claude Hugot.
INTERVIEW BANNED, REPORTERS PROSECUTED
The interview Owens conducted with Poussard, released in August 2024, was banned from YouTube by December.
In addition to Poussard’s lengthy, in-depth, six-part series on Brigitte, a publication called Pressibus also compiled a dense, comprehensive, spiderweb of a dossier containing burgeoning “evidence”, that connects literally thousands of dots in the Brigitte Macron mystery.
Reporter Natacha Rey, and her confidant, a self-proclaimed “spiritual medium” named Amandine Roy, were both prosecuted for discussing the story in a public YouTube video. The court found them guilty of defamation in September 2024, and they were ordered to pay damages to Brigitte Macron.
It’s interesting to note that the Macrons have not filed a defamation, libel or slander suit – or any suit – against the original journalist who broke the story, Xavier Poussard. They only targeted Rey and Roy for defamation. Possibly because they don’t want to see Poussard unpacking that fat file in court.
CANDACE OWENS DOUBLES DOWN
Despite the allegations against Brigitte Macron being widely dismissed by Western mainstream media as a hoax, Candace Owens is sticking to her guns – going so far as to “stake her professional career and reputation on it” and betting Piers Morgan $150k that she is right about Brigitte.
Candace was warned by the Macrons not to publish or publicize the contents of their legal letter. Her response was to jump right back onto her channel and publicly dissect the cr*p out of the document. Then she posted it on all her platforms.
Why..?
Because, as she said, addressing the Macrons directly, “I don’t know if nobody told you this…but I’m pregnant. And when I get pregnant…I don’t take kindly to threats.”
‘YOU ARE NOT ABOVE REPROACH, MACRON‘
If the Macrons thought the lawyer’s letter would intimidate the feisty and tenacious Owens, they were sorely mistaken.
Candace reminded the French leader; “You are a sitting president, not above reproach or critique. I am certainly allowed to look into you and your life and ask questions.”
Owens believes she only received this letter now, some six months after her last video on Brigitte, because the Macron’s have somehow found out that she has just done a devastating interview (with an unnamed source) that is part of another explosive piece on Brigitte, due to come out in the next week or two.
COME TO COURT, I DARE YOU, SAYS OWENS
In a second video response to the Macrons, Owens restated her position and adamantly confirmed she was not backing down. In her wrap-up monologue, she threw down the gauntlet.
“I want you to come to Tennessee so bad!” She said. “Bring this to the great state. I’ll file the lawsuit for you. I might even cover your legal expenses if you show up, if you have – excuse me – the balls . I love a good fight.”
In case there was any doubt, she concluded with a message for Brigitte; “And yes…I truly, truly – now more than when I first reported the story – believe that you were born…a man.”
The Macrons have yet to respond to the challenge.
What say you, SA? Could French first lady, Brigitte Macron possibly be a man – and does it matter if they lie about it?
Let us know by clicking on the comment tab below this article or by emailing info@thesouthafrican.com or sending a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. You can also follow @TheSAnews on X and The South African on Facebook for the latest news.
