Article initially printed on GroundUp by Edwin Cameron
On 30 November 2022, Cabinet ultimately authorized a draft statute to abolish criminal penalties for intercourse work (Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Bill). The Bill scraps the crime of shopping for and promoting grownup sexual providers. It opens a path to victory for activists who over lengthy years campaigned for it.
The Bill goals to spear two history-encrusted legal guidelines: the Sexual Offences Act 1957 (apartheid’s fearsome “Immorality Act”), and part 11 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act of 2007. Both goal adults, largely susceptible girls, who make a dwelling by promoting intercourse.
Having secured Cabinet endorsement, the Bill is now up for public remark. The moralist foyer have seized the possibility to push again laborious. They need the law to proceed punishing girls and others who interact in intercourse for reward.
Bill:
Yet Parliament ought to undertake the Bill – and as quickly as attainable. Penalties on grownup intercourse work are a horrible hangover from a harsher, extra ignorant, much less public-health-conscious period. They have no place in a wholesome democracy. As with historic crimes focusing on queer individuals like myself, and the appalling apartheid penalties for intercourse between black and white, these legal guidelines are dangerous, degrading and unjust. We ought to consign them to the dustbin with out extra ado.
All the Bill does is to abolish crimes of intercourse work. Rightly, authorities foresees additional laws to control intercourse work: where and the way and beneath what situations sexual providers could also be supplied on the market – simply as we regulate different business interchanges.
Sex staff and human rights advocates have fervently welcomed the Bill. The Sex Worker Advocacy Taskforce (SWEAT) and the Sisonke National Sex Worker’s Movement have lengthy urged decriminalisation. They argue, convincingly, that making intercourse work against the law exposes (primarily) girls to blackmail, police malpractice and consumer abuse. Decriminalisation permits intercourse staff to hunt and assert the law’s safety.
Some nonetheless declare that ending the crime of intercourse work licenses exploitation and can result in elevated intercourse trafficking. Many suggest as a substitute the “Nordic model”. This decriminalises intercourse work for these offering it – however targets purchasers who use it. In different phrases, shopping for intercourse stays against the law, although the vendor is barely not directly focused; the principle goal is the “john”, who pays.
ALSO READ: Bill in search of to decriminalise intercourse work now open for public remark
Sex work and security
We are proper to be involved for the security and dignity of intercourse staff. Many are impoverished girls or queer individuals, usually extra susceptible due to race or cross-border standing. Their work is commonly troublesome and generally harmful.
Those who say “scrap the crime” are usually not blind to this. On the opposite: it’s exactly these vulnerabilities that impel them to advocate decriminalisation. It is as a result of many who promote sexual providers as a livelihood technique are marginalised or stigmatised or poor that dumping the load of the criminal law on prime of their different burdens is so merciless.
Sex staff themselves overwhelmingly plead for scrapping these legal guidelines. They have firsthand data of the grief and perils of their day by day duties. Proponents of decriminalisation level out that, all through historical past, criminal legal guidelines have by no means stopped intercourse work. It has thrived in each authorized system. Criminalisation is a merely “symbolic” abolition – an ineffectual authorized measure that however cruelly marginalises intercourse staff.
As SWEAT merely states, “criminalisation kills”. When intercourse work is against the law, intercourse staff are condemned to unsafe, unregulated working situations, with no sensible authorized protections as staff, and little entry to well being care or different help.
Working spots
In interviews with intercourse staff throughout South Africa, Human Rights Watch discovered they report being susceptible as a result of criminalisation compelled them to work in or go to darkish or harmful spots “and because criminals, including sadists, thieves, and rapists, pretending to be clients, knew they had bad relations with the police”. Sex staff described being laughed at by police once they tried to report rapes, “or being told that as sex workers, they could not be raped.”
Some by no means hassle reporting rape or abuse, as a result of, with criminal threats looming, relationships with police characteristic arbitrary arrests, lack of due course of, abusive practices and – all too usually – the specter of rape, assault or bribery by the police. Almost three-quarters of the 46 intercourse staff Human Rights Watch interviewed for its research had been arrested a number of occasions, some as usually as two or thrice per thirty days.
In Revolting Prostitutes, intercourse staff Juno Mac and Molly Smith present convincingly how the Nordic mannequin harms intercourse staff. Criminalising patrons of sexual providers leads purchasers to hunt extra secrecy. This will increase threat, as intercourse staff stay prey to surveillance, harassment and “humiliating” criminal law processes to convict “johns”.
These findings affirm years of analysis findings in South Africa and the continent.
The savvy Minister for Justice and Correctional Services, Ronald Lamola, echoed these insights. He defined how the Bill (during which his Deputy, John Jeffery, had a big hand) embodies our nation’s National Strategic Plan on Gender-Based Violence and Femicide.
Violence on girls
The motive is straightforward, however ghastly – “criminalisation of sex work contributes” to gender-based violence and femicide. This is as a result of “it leaves sex workers unprotected by the law, unable to exercise their rights as citizens and open to abuse generally, not least when they approach state facilities for assistance.”
Government reckons – and intercourse staff agree – that the Bill will cut back stigma, discrimination and violence in opposition to intercourse staff; assist them entry well being care, together with reproductive well being providers; and convey intercourse staff nearer to well being, security and labour legal guidelines. The proof helps these hopes.
New Zealand decriminalised intercourse work in 2003. Two many years later, the intercourse trade has not grown. Nor has it develop into “a global destination country for sex trafficking”, as scaremongers opposing our Bill prophesy right here. No. The variety of intercourse staff in New Zealand has remained regular – whereas intercourse staff there report improved dwelling and dealing situations. Sex staff discovered that police attitudes improved and that it was simpler to refuse purchasers. Almost all thought of that they now had elevated employment, authorized, well being and security protections.
These issues are highly effective. But the bottom argument is identical as with queer individuals and cross-racial intercourse: an honest society has no proper to inform consenting adults in personal, beneath criminal risk, what they need to do with their our bodies.
ALSO READ: Russia set to ban LGBTI+ content material from streaming platforms
Demands for intercourse work
The “Nordic model”, claiming concern for intercourse staff, springs from the identical impulse as all different criminal legal guidelines on intercourse work – ethical condemnation. The law rightly disapproves dangerous conduct. But it has no place within the personal relations of consenting adults. This debate is about security – however, greater than that, it is usually about dignity and autonomy.
Sex staff’ calls for are clear: decriminalise, now. Once we get the criminal law out of the way in which, we are able to start to supply complete, accessible help providers, whereas respecting the complete humanity of intercourse staff. They have company – and are able to making their very own choices on tips on how to feed their kids, home their mother and father and pay for research.
The sooner we rid our statute e-book of the degrading makes an attempt to impose ethical views on intercourse staff, the higher we are able to handle the true ills of our society: poverty, inequality, corruption, gangsterism and the grim energy of criminal syndicates in authorities. We have a lot to do. This Bill will give us extra energy to do it.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ARTICLES BY GROUND UP