According to court papers filed on 19 February 2026, Mkhwanazi is asking the court to declare social media and media statements about him false and defamatory.

He wants the court to interdict Mathibeli from repeating claims that he is corrupt, criminal, captured by private interests, or involved in unlawful killings.

This stems from the police raid from uis offices that took place on Friday where it was alleged that Calvin Security Personnels were held hostage by SAPS.

This led to Mathibeli posting a lengthy letter detailing a 7-year battle with KZN SAPS and Mkhwanazi whom he claimed want him dead.

As if that was not enough, Mathibeli made some explosive allegations accusing Mkhwanazi of being a rogue police officer who was taking protection fees from taxi owners in KZN.

In his court papers, Mkhwanazi stated that he orders the removal and retraction of all such posts within 24 hours and equire public retractions on TV and radio platforms where the statements were allegedly repeated.

He further said he will pursue damages in separate proceedings.

The matter has been brought on an urgent basis and is set to be heard on 24 February 2026.

Mkhwanazi argues that the statements harm his reputation and integrity as a senior police official.

Mathibeli has been given an opportunity to oppose the application which he has already filed later on Thursday in Sandton.

Visit MDNtv YouTube Channel for our video content

The post KZN Police Commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi Interdicted Businessman Calvin Mathibeli In Urgent High Court Application appeared first on MDNtv.

This kind of request is meant to provide quick, temporary help for spouses and kids when a marriage is ending, keeping things fair and affordable in the meantime.

The judge decided she hadn’t been completely open about her money situation. It turned out she had overstated how much she needed and downplayed the help her husband was already giving.

The couple got married in 2012 without sharing property, but with a system where they’d split any growth in assets later. They have two young kids, ages nine and four. Things fell apart, and they separated in December 2023. The kids are mostly with the mom right now, and the dad sees them regularly but not as much as he’d like.

The dad asked the court for more time with the kids and even shared living arrangements. They talked about adding some extra overnight visits during the hearing, but the judge didn’t change anything yet, saying there wasn’t enough info to decide.

Instead, the judge sent the parenting issues to a family advocate for a proper look and report. This neutral expert will help figure out what’s best for the kids. Until that’s done, the current setup stays the same.

The woman wanted R20,000 a month for the kids, R30,000 for herself, and R80,000 for lawyer fees. She said she quit her job at her husband’s suggestion to focus on raising the family, and he’d been the main earner.

But the husband showed he was already covering close to R38,000 a month for her and the kids’ needs, like cash, school, medical stuff, and more. He also questioned her claims about his earnings and said she could support herself.

After checking everything, the judge saw that she hadn’t mentioned all the support he was providing or her own income fully.

The judge pointed out that these requests require total honesty and full details about finances. Hiding stuff or misleading can sink the whole claim.

She claimed she had no money, but didn’t share the full picture.

The judge also said no to the legal cost help, because she didn’t prove she really needed it, that he could afford it, or that it was essential for her case.

In the end, the judge made her pay his legal costs and dismissed her entire request.

The main divorce case is still going, and the family advocate’s report will likely shape decisions about the kids moving forward.

Visit MDNtv YouTube Channel for our video content

The post Court Turns Down Woman’s R130,000 Monthly Support Request, Citing Hidden Finances and Inflated Expenses appeared first on MDNtv.

Sandlana, a prominent and influential figure within the IPHC, is facing serious allegations linked to corruption and the alleged misuse of funds. The case has sparked widespread debate, not only within religious circles but also among the broader public, with many questioning issues of accountability, leadership, and transparency in powerful institutions.

Court weighs seriousness of charges

During proceedings, the court considered several key factors, including the seriousness of the charges, the strength of the state’s case, and whether granting bail would be in the interests of justice. Prosecutors argued that the matter involves significant sums of money and an alleged breach of trust, while the defence maintained that Sandlana has cooperated with authorities and does not pose a flight risk.

Click here to watch the bail judgment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXFt83y8NI4&pp=ygUFbWRudHY%3D

The bail judgement is regarded as a pivotal moment in the case, as it may influence how the matter proceeds toward trial.

Mixed reactions outside court

Outside the courtroom, emotions ran high. Supporters gathered in prayer, expressing confidence in Sandlana’s innocence and calling for patience as the legal process unfolds. Others, however, view the case as a wake up call, saying it highlights the need for stronger oversight and accountability within large and influential organisations, including churches.

A case with national implications

The matter has resonated beyond the courtroom, reigniting national conversations about corruption, ethical leadership, and the responsibility of public and religious leaders. Legal experts say the outcome of the bail process could shape public confidence as the case moves through the justice system.

As proceedings continue, further court appearances are expected, with the trial phase likely to draw even greater scrutiny.

This is a developing story. More updates will follow as new information becomes available.

Visit MDNtv YouTube Channel for our video content

The post IPHC Pastor Michael Sandlana Appears in Court for Bail Judgement in Corruption Case appeared first on MDNtv.

Speaking during a live-streamed press conference watched across South Africa, Madonsela said she was forced to break her silence after months of what she calls a “relentless character assassination campaign” linked to the estate of her late partner, businessman Richard “Dick” Foxton, who passed away on 21 June 2025.

“I Come With a Heavy Heart”: Why Madonsela Spoke Out Now

Madonsela opened the briefing by explaining that she had tried to deal with her partner’s passing privately and with dignity, but escalating developments left her with no choice.

“I come to this platform reluctantly with a heavy heart… Nearly six months since the passing of my late partner,” she said.

According to Madonsela, shortly after she filed court papers challenging a will she believes does not reflect Foxton’s true wishes, she became the target of damaging media reports portraying her as greedy and embroiled in a “bitter family dispute”.

She strongly rejected that narrative.

“I have had no fight with the Foxton family. The only party that has had issues with me since hours of bereavement is someone my partner trusted with his business and finances.”

Shock Eviction Attempt Days After Foxton’s Death

One of the most disturbing revelations was an attempted eviction just two days after Foxton died.

Madonsela told journalists that while she was mourning, a message was posted in a family WhatsApp group instructing that the Johannesburg apartment she shared with Foxton be locked and vacated immediately.

“This was not a court order. It was a chilling WhatsApp message,” she said.

She stressed that the apartment was their primary home, where they spent holidays, Christmases and years together, while a Stellenbosch house was mainly for work and future retirement.

The attempted eviction, she said, traumatised not only her but also her children and Foxton’s son, Justin Foxton, who had travelled to Johannesburg to mourn his father.

Life Partner, Not a “Casual Relationship”

Madonsela was emphatic that her relationship with Foxton was public, long-term and deeply committed, lasting nearly a decade.

She revealed:

They met in 2016 and became engaged in 2018

She was introduced publicly as his partner

She lived with him and supported him until his final weeks

She cited messages from Foxton’s own family members acknowledging her role in his life and confirming that he regarded her as the love of his life.

“Every speaker at the funeral treated me as his spouse. Our relationship was never secret.”

She described as “bizarre and hurtful” demands that she stop calling herself his partner, despite the very will being defended referring to her as such.

Alleged Fraud, Missing Documents and a Disputed Will

At the centre of the legal battle is a disputed will, with Madonsela challenging what she described as a purported 2025 will that allegedly:

Does not comply with legal requirements

Is missing the original document

Contradicts earlier valid wills

She also raised serious concerns about estate reporting, claiming that documents lodged with the Master of the High Court:

Incorrectly listed the deceased as having no children

Misrepresented who the “nearest relative” was

Underreported assets

Madonsela confirmed she has formally asked for the removal of the executors, arguing they lack impartiality and failed in their fiduciary duties.

R10 Million Property Valuation Sparks Safety Fears

One of the most alarming moments of the briefing came when Madonsela addressed reports that the home she currently lives in was allegedly valued at R10 million without her knowledge or consent.

“I never authorised anyone to access my home for a valuation,” she said.

She explained that professional valuations require physical access, raising fears that someone may have entered her home without permission.

Security experts, she revealed, advised her to make the issue public in case “anything happens” to her.

“The thought of unauthorised access to my home left a chilling effect on my family.”

“This Is Not About Money”

Madonsela firmly rejected claims that she is seeking more than what was provided for in earlier wills.

“I am not asking for double the bequest. That would be unlawful.”

Her court application, she said, seeks only:

A declaration that the disputed will is invalid

Enforcement of valid earlier bequests

Removal of executors appointed under questionable circumstances

Appointment of an impartial executor

She also confirmed that her rights as a surviving life partner are grounded in constitutional and statutory law following key Constitutional Court judgments.

A Call for Justice and Transparency

In closing, an emotional Madonsela said the last six months had forced her to grieve while simultaneously defending her dignity, her safety and her partner’s legacy.

“I consider these grave injustices.”

She called on the Department of Justice to conduct a forensic investigation into the estate, particularly what she described as potentially fraudulent reporting.

“I did not invite you to judge these matters. I expect the court to judge them.”

Madonsela ended by thanking her children, supportive members of the Foxton family, colleagues, friends, and South Africans who have offered prayers and messages of support.

Why This Story Matters

This unfolding legal battle involving one of South Africa’s most respected public figures raises profound questions about estate administration, women’s rights, life partnerships, and the abuse of power during bereavement.

As the courts prepare to rule, the nation will be watching closely.

Visit MDNtv YouTube Channel for our video content

The post Thuli Madonsela Breaks Silence on R10 Million Legal Battle, Eviction Threats and Safety Fears After Partner’s Death appeared first on MDNtv.

The man, whose identity is withheld to protect the child, took his case to the Western Cape High Court after the Cape Town Magistrate’s Court ruled that he was the father. Representing himself, he argued that it had not been proven “beyond reasonable doubt” that he is the child’s biological parent.

The case dates back to 2001, when the first paternity test indicated that he was not the father. Years later, in 2016, the child’s mother approached the maintenance court, insisting that he was indeed the biological parent. A second test was ordered in 2017, because the earlier test did not meet accreditation standards. This time, the results showed that he was the father.

A new magistrate later took over the matter and inexplicably ordered a third test in 2019, which again confirmed paternity. The case was then reassigned, and yet another magistrate requested a fourth DNA test. The man objected, bringing an application to have the magistrate recused and the directive set aside. A fourth magistrate eventually ruled that another test was unnecessary and that the court would work with the evidence already on record.

After hearing the case, the court ruled once more that the man was the father.

Still unhappy, he turned to the High Court, arguing that the DNA results were never properly introduced into evidence and should not have carried weight unless supported by expert testimony. He also claimed that the labs that conducted the later tests were not located in the Western Cape and had compared his results to the wrong population group.

He acknowledged knowing the mother years ago but denied ever being romantically involved with her. He said she used to visit his bar in 1999 but that he banned her after she stole a photo—something she later returned. He insisted he had no contact with her again until 2001, when his wife informed him that the woman was claiming he was the father of her four-month-old baby.

The mother’s timeline was inconsistent in several areas, but she remained firm that she and the man were intimate in early August 2000, when the child was conceived.

After reviewing the case, the High Court concluded that even if the maintenance court made errors in handling the DNA evidence, it still reached the correct conclusion. The judges noted that the second and third DNA tests showed a high probability that he was the father, and that DNA testing is a well-established scientific method with strong evidential value.

His appeal was dismissed.

Visit MDNtv YouTube Channel for our video content

The post Cape Town Man Fights Court Ruling After Multiple DNA Tests Link Him to Child appeared first on MDNtv.

The case, filed on 17 November 2025 in the Johannesburg High Court, comes after months of tension between Christian groups and the CRL, following the Commission’s decision to form what it called a “Section 22 Committee.”

According to the SACD, this committee was created illegally and is part of a broader attempt to place churches, doctrines, and religious leadership under state control — something Parliament had previously rejected.

Tensions Reach Breaking Point

The dispute escalated on 2 October 2025, when SACD says the CRL reignited an old regulatory agenda without legal authority or public consultation.

The move sparked outrage among Christian organisations, who accused the CRL of ignoring constitutional limits and acting in defiance of Parliament’s earlier decisions.

Thousands of believers marched from Pretoria to Cape Town on 8 October and again on 13 November, presenting a memorandum to both the President and Parliament.

But SACD says the CRL refused to back down, dismissing calls for restraint and showing “disturbing indifference” to the rights of the Christian community.

A ‘Moment of Truth’ for Religious Freedom

SACD argues that South Africa has now reached a critical turning point.

The organisation wants the High Court to:

Declare the Section 22 Committee unlawful

Strike down the CRL’s attempts to regulate church doctrine, leadership and training

Reject the CRL’s classification of charismatic churches as a “national security threat”

SACD describes the case as a direct challenge to a Chapter 9 institution it believes has gone far beyond its mandate and interfered in the “sacred terrain” of worship and church autonomy.

The Fight Moves to the High Court

The application was officially served on 18 November 2025 on the CRL’s chairperson, Ms Thoko Mkhwanazi-Xaluva, Mr Musa Xulu and the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs.

With the matter now heading to the High Court, the future of religious freedom in South Africa is set to be contested with “unprecedented intensity.”

SACD Vows to Continue the Battle

In a firm statement, SACD said it would pursue the case relentlessly to defend the Church and protect constitutional rights:

“We will not allow any institution to erode the freedoms guaranteed to every believer in this nation.”

The organisation promised to provide further updates as the court proceedings unfold.

Visit MDNtv YouTube Channel for our video content

The post Church Defenders Take CRL to Court as Battle Over Religious Freedom Reaches Breaking Point appeared first on MDNtv.

The matter seeks an interdict preventing ActionSA from replacing the councillors, pending the outcome of a dispute regarding their contested dismissal from the council.

The councillors maintain that their removal was procedurally flawed and politically motivated, asserting that the party failed to follow its own internal disciplinary and constitutional processes. Two Cease and Desist letters were issued to ActionSA’s leadership, cautioning the party against proceeding with replacements while the dispute remained unresolved. These letters, however, were ignored, prompting the councillors to turn to the courts for urgent intervention.

The eight councillors were informed at the end of September of their removal as PR Councillors for ActionSA, effectively vacating their seats in the Johannesburg Council. The councillors argue that the decision was taken without affording them a fair hearing or the opportunity to appeal, in contravention of both the party’s constitution and the principles of natural justice.

Their application to the High Court seeks to suspend any attempt by ActionSA to submit replacement names to the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) until the legality of their dismissal has been determined.

The urgent hearing will take place on 28 October 2025 at the High Court in Johannesburg. The councillors are represented by their legal counsel, and further public statements will be issued following the court’s decision.

Visit MDNtv YouTube Channel for our video content

The post Urgent High Court Application: Eight Former ActionSA Councillors Seek Interdict Against Replacement appeared first on MDNtv.

The Judicial Conduct Tribunal in the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court is investigating allegations of sexual harassment against Judge President Selby Mbenenge. The complaint was made by Andiswa Mengo. The tribunal is continuing its probe into the allegations.

Judicial Conduct Tribunal Hearing for Judge President Mbenenge | 09 July 2025

#southafrica #mdnnews #mdntv

FOR MORE NEWS, visit (www.mdntvlive.com).

FOLLOW #MDNTV on all social media platforms.

FOR ADVERTISING email us on………………………….. advertising@mdntvlive.com

FOR INTERVIEWS email us on ………….. interviews@mdntvlive.com

JOIN our WhatsApp group and send us your stories.

source

The post Judicial Conduct Tribunal Hearing for Judge President Mbenenge | 09 July 2025 appeared first on MDNtv.

The Judicial Conduct Tribunal in the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court is investigating allegations of sexual harassment against Judge President Selby Mbenenge. The complaint was made by Andiswa Mengo. The tribunal is continuing its probe into the allegations.

Judicial Conduct Tribunal Hearing for Judge President Mbenenge | 08 July 2025

#southafrica #mdnnews #mdntv

FOR MORE NEWS, visit (www.mdntvlive.com).

FOLLOW #MDNTV on all social media platforms.

FOR ADVERTISING email us on………………………….. advertising@mdntvlive.com

FOR INTERVIEWS email us on ………….. interviews@mdntvlive.com

JOIN our WhatsApp group and send us your stories.

source

The post Judicial Conduct Tribunal Hearing for Judge President Mbenenge | 08 July 2025 appeared first on MDNtv.

The Judicial Conduct Tribunal in the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court is investigating allegations of sexual harassment against Judge President Selby Mbenenge. The complaint was made by Andiswa Mengo. The tribunal is continuing its probe into the allegations.

Judicial Conduct Tribunal Hearing for Judge President Mbenenge | 07 July 2025

#southafrica #mdnnews #mdntv

FOR MORE NEWS, visit (www.mdntvlive.com).

FOLLOW #MDNTV on all social media platforms.

FOR ADVERTISING email us on………………………….. advertising@mdntvlive.com

FOR INTERVIEWS email us on ………….. interviews@mdntvlive.com

JOIN our WhatsApp group and send us your stories.

source

The post Judicial Conduct Tribunal Hearing for Judge President Mbenenge | 07 July 2025 appeared first on MDNtv.