The plan involves building 3,400 housing units in an area known as E1, located between East Jerusalem and the settlement of Maale Adumim. Construction there had been on hold for about 20 years due to international pressure, but the new approval clears the way for work to begin.

Opponents argue this will make a future Palestinian state nearly impossible, as it would block the north and south of the West Bank from connecting, disrupting any chance of a continuous Palestinian territory.

Supporters of the project, including Israeli officials in charge of settlement policy, argue that every new housing unit strengthens Israel’s control of the land. Some leaders openly say the project is meant to permanently eliminate the possibility of a Palestinian state.

The Palestinian Authority strongly condemned the decision, calling it illegal and warning that it will “destroy” the chances of peace. They also accused Israel of using the war as cover to push forward settlement plans that would isolate Palestinian communities into separate enclaves.

International criticism has followed. Leaders from Europe, the Middle East, and elsewhere said the decision violates international law and undermines hopes for a two-state solution. Some countries called for sanctions or other pressure to halt construction.

Israel, however, rejects claims that the settlements are illegal. Officials insist that Jewish people have the right to live in these areas and argue that international rulings against them are biased.

The settlement expansion comes at a time of heightened conflict, with violence in Gaza and the West Bank escalating. Critics warn that approving E1 is not only about housing but about reshaping the map in a way that permanently blocks a Palestinian state.

“Visit MDNtv YouTube Channel for our video content

The post Israel Approves Settlement Project That Divides West Bank appeared first on MDNtv.

Under the deal, Uganda will accept a number of African and Asian migrants who previously sought asylum at the US-Mexico border, provided they have no criminal records. The exact number Uganda will take remains uncertain.

Honduras has agreed to receive several hundred deported people from Spanish-speaking countries over the next two years, including families with children. Officials also indicated that the country may consider taking in more beyond that timeframe.

These arrangements are part of a broader push by the Trump administration to secure deportation agreements with multiple nations, even those with troubling human rights records. More than a dozen countries across different regions have already signed similar deals.

Critics, including human rights groups and UN experts, warn that such policies put migrants at risk of being sent to places where they could face danger or further displacement. They argue the agreements may also violate international law since people are being removed to countries that are not their own.

Earlier this year, Rwanda agreed to take in up to 250 migrants from the US, though it insisted on reviewing each individual case. Panama and Costa Rica have also agreed to accept several hundred African and Asian migrants. Meanwhile, Washington has approached other nations, including Ecuador and Spain, about taking part in the program.

The push follows a Supreme Court ruling in June that cleared the way for the administration to resume deportations to third countries without requiring hearings on potential risks. The decision drew sharp dissent from three justices, who called it an abuse of judicial power.

Deportation has been a centerpiece of President Trump’s second-term agenda, fulfilling one of his key campaign promises. Supporters say it strengthens border control, while opponents argue it strips vulnerable people of protection and safety.

“Visit MDNtv YouTube Channel for our video content

The post US Signs Deportation Deals with Honduras and Uganda appeared first on MDNtv.

Political analyst Ntsikelelo Breakfast raised concerns about the government’s motives behind the National Dialogue, saying the process appeared rushed and lacked transparency.

The event has also faced backlash over its high cost, with several prominent legacy foundations pulling out in protest. Among them are the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Steve Biko Foundation, and the Desmond Tutu and Leah Tutu Foundation.

These organisations cited issues of government control and poor planning as key reasons for their withdrawal, casting doubt on the credibility of the dialogue.

“Visit MDNtv YouTube Channel for our video content

The post National Convention Criticised for Rushed Planning and Government Control appeared first on MDNtv.