Discussions on whether or not impartial candidates can contest elections in a number of areas was the principle half of Parliament’s assembly on Tuesday.
The Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs met to debate the Electoral Amendment Bill after it was granted a six-month extension by the Constitutional Court (ConCourt) to proceed with its work earlier this month.
The committee has already stated it plans to ship the Bill to President Cyril Ramaphosa by the top of September, with its deadline to amend the Electoral Act set for 10 December.
Contesting areas
During the discussions on Tuesday, the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC) urged that impartial candidates must be allowed to contest in multiple province, which was backed by the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) and the Democratic Alliance (DA).
The committee’s Content Advisor Adam Salmon earlier within the briefing had made a presentation of the excellent points that wanted to be deliberated within the Bill – together with the matter of contesting areas.
Salmon stated if events agreed to the inclusion of impartial candidates’ brokers, the committee must ask the National Assembly for permission to take action.
He additionally indicated that the committee also needs to resolve on the possible share of signatures to be required from independents to face for elections and the deposit they’d be required to pay.
ALSO READ: Concern raised over Parliament’s two-month break after Electoral Bill extension
Responding to the presentation, DA MP Adrian Roos stated: “The position of the DA is that independent candidates should be able to participate in all regions. One needs to say that a party can run in all provinces and independent candidates should be able to do so.”
IFP MP Liezl van der Merwe expressed the identical sentiment.
“I am fully in support of the proposal that they should be able to contest in more than one region, and that of course then take up a seat in the provincial legislature where they got the most votes,” she stated.
However, ANC MP Tidimalo Legwase argued that impartial candidates ought to contest one province as a result of they will solely occupy one seat.
“I imagine an impartial candidate should solely contest at an area the place they’re registered [and] they reside.
“They should not be able to contest in all the provinces because in as much as we want to say that political parties contests in all the areas, they are political parties [but] being independent means one. So in my view there’s no single person that stays in many provinces,” she stated.
Meanwhile, IEC CEO Sy Mamabolo defined why the fee proposed the participation of impartial candidates in all provinces.
“The reason for that proposition is that National Assembly is a national constituency. It is not broken down, as it were, it is one national entity. So you should be able, therefore, to contest that national entity from anywhere,” he informed MPs.
READ MORE: ‘New Electoral Act could just be a sneaky way to steal power’ from voters
“[This] logic is in our legislation because if you [look at] section 24(a), where you vote outside of your voting station for the national ballot you can cast it anywhere essentially… precisely because we are all voting for this one national constituency, which is the National Assembly. That option should be available to both party and independent candidates,” Mamabolo added.
The IEC boss though did level out that it could be completely different for provincial elections, the place the candidates should be residents the place they’re contesting.
Referring to impartial candidates, he additional stated: “In the event you win multiple seats in different regions, you take the seat where you won most votes.”
Some members of the committee agreed that the impartial candidates ought to have occasion brokers and that there must be a provision within the Bill for the candidates to submit a quantity of signatures to compete in an election.
On the matter of deposits, the committee’s chairperson Mosa Chabane stated this problem could be left to the IEC to manage, including that additional deliberations on whether or not signatures – amongst others issues – must be within the invoice or not would happen in future conferences.
“To keep away from speeding to a vote on the matter, the committee felt it prudent to additional persuade one another as a way to arrive at a consensus reasonably than an imposition.
“It is for this reason that the committee will continue to deliberate on the contentious areas with the aim of finding a middle ground,” stated Chabane stated in a statement on Wednesday.
The committee will meet subsequent week regardless of Parliament being in recess till 15 August.
NOW READ: Parliament plans to ship Electoral Amendment Bill to Ramaphosa by September
