Concerns are being expressed that the government might hijack the patron advantages of an expected discount in fuel costs and use them to pay for the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project (GFIP).
Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) CEO Wayne Duvenage stated on Tuesday the organisation is anxious that Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana might seize the chance offered by the expected petrol price discount within the first week of September to enhance the fuel levy by 25c to 30c per litre to elevate extra income to cowl the GFIP bonds, which the e-toll debacle has failed to do.
Read: Petrol and diesel may fall by over R2 a litre in September
This follows Transport Minister Fikile Mbalula’s admission in June {that a} resolution taken by cupboard on e-tolls was taking government within the path of the fuel levy – however this plan was scrapped due to the then sharp will increase in oil and fuel costs.
Mbalula added {that a} closing resolution on the way forward for e-tolls will be introduced when Godongwana delivers the Medium Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS) in October, or earlier than then.
He stated the fuel price had surged, with the battle between Russia and Ukraine exacerbating the scenario in South Africa.
Mbalula stated the fuel price, amongst different elements, affected the government’s resolution to backtrack on the concept of utilizing the fuel levy “to do away with [e-tolls on] GFIP”.
“The fuel levy story has become very messy over time and it’s no longer an option we can consider, among others. So we are not taking that route. We are looking at various options in terms of e-tolls, which we will finalise before the MTBPS,” he stated on the time.
Read:
Government scraps plan to use fuel levy as an alternative of e-tolls to pay for GFIP
Will Sanral obtain any bids for the Gauteng open highway tolling tender?
The Automobile Association (AA) reported on Monday that important decreases in fuel costs are expected in September primarily based on present unaudited mid-month information from the Central Energy Fund.
It stated the expected decreases in September will not be mitigated – as they have been this month – by any refunds to the General Fuel Levy (GFL) and that the fuel price reductions will subsequently be substantial.
It stated the newest information signifies that 95 unleaded petrol (ULP) is expected to drop by about R2.60 a litre and 93 ULP by about R2.45 per litre, whereas the wholesale price of diesel is expected to lower by about R2.30 per litre and the price of illuminating paraffin by virtually R2.00 per litre.
The AA stated the principle drivers behind the expected decreases are the strengthening within the worth of the rand and decrease worldwide oil costs.
‘Strong hints’
Duvenage referred to Mbalula’s feedback that an announcement on the e-toll resolution is expected to coincide with the MTBPS in October, and to sturdy hints that the Minister of Finance will enhance the fuel levy to off-set the scrapping of e-tolls.
“Should this happen, Outa will denounce this decision on the basis that the fuel levy has already been increased in excess of R2.50 per litre since the Gauteng freeway upgrade began in 2008,” he stated.
“Government failed to take up Outa’s suggestion of a ring-fenced 10c per litre increase to the fuel levy some 11 years ago, which would have settled the freeway bonds by today,” he added.
Duvenage stated the government has made extraordinarily poor selections previously, not solely on the varied fuel levies and taxes, but in addition on the highway financing choices obtainable to it.
He warned that short-term monetary good points lead to long-term unfavourable ramifications for taxpayers, including {that a} 25-cents-a-litre enhance within the fuel levy will end in a further R5.5 billion flowing into Treasury’s coffers every year.
Read:
Fuel retailers rebuked for elevating fuel levy and tax points
Temporary fuel levy aid will be withdrawn from August
Duvenage stated this influx wants to be in contrast to “a correctly priced Gauteng freeway upgrade, which ought not to have cost the state more than R0.5 billion a year to finance this capital investment over 20 years”.
He added that then minister of finance Nhlanhla Nene determined in February 2015 to introduce huge and pointless will increase of 14% or 30c a litre to the overall fuel levy and 48% or 50c a litre to the Road Accident Fund (RAF) levy after the petrol price dropped from barely over R14 per litre in mid-2014 to R10.31 a litre eight months later.
“These short-term decisions may provide government with quick-fix short-term tax gains, but they have a detrimental impact on the country over the long term.”
He added: “Government should instead be looking at introducing greater efficiency into managing the country’s affairs, as opposed to seeking ways to lean more heavily on its taxpayers.”
Source: Outa
AA spokesperson Layton Beard stated on Tuesday the AA can be sad if the government elevated the fuel levy to pay for the GFIP.
He stated the overall fuel levy generates R90 billion for the fiscus yearly and the AA helps using a portion of those funds to pay for the GFIP, however that is topic to the fuel levy not being elevated and the government utilizing the present funds being raised to pay for the GFIP.
“Had this happened 10 years ago when the suggestion was first muted to ring fence a portion of the money from the general fuel levy for this exact purpose, there would not have been an issue with the funding of GFIP,” added.
Tax on the poor
“The general fuel levy is currently pegged at R3.93 per litre and the AA has consistently over the last decade or even more been saying you cannot increase the fuel levy because it will increase the price of a litre of fuel and it’s a tax on the poor and just places extra financial pressure on every consumer in the country,” stated Beard.
Beard famous that the funds raised through the present fuel levy go into the pot of funds administered by National Treasury, and questioned how this cash is at present allotted – and whether it is being misappropriated.
He agreed that it will even be opposite to the government’s user-charge precept to allocate funds raised via the fuel levy to non-road-transport-related tasks.
