Gavin Hudson was handed a poisoned chalice when he accepted the CEO place of scandal-plagued sugar and land group Tongaat Hulett in 2019.
That’s the view of long-time Tongaat watcher and chief funding officer at Opportune Investments Chris Logan, talking to Moneyweb following information that Hudson has resigned from the embattled KZN-based group and can go away on the finish of February.
Read: Gavin Hudson resigns as Tongaat Hulett CEO
One of Hudson’s first selections as CEO was to nominate PwC to conduct a forensic investigation into accounting and governance malpractice for the 2018 and 2019 monetary years – when the previous administration group below (then) CEO Peter Staude was discovered to be cooking the books to spice up government bonuses.
Outgoing Tongaat Hulett CEO Gavin Hudson. Image: Supplied
Hudson could not have absolutely appreciated the depth of swamp he discovered himself in when first taking up the CEO place.
The monetary statements had been worse than meaningless – they had been criminally misleading, as demonstrated by the 97% share worth wipe-out since 2018.
Staude and former chief monetary officer Murray Munro had been amongst a number of former executives who appeared within the Durban High Court in September 2022 on costs of fraud amounting to R3.5 billion, all associated to their tenure at Tongaat. The case resumes on 17 February.
Read:
Tongaat Hulett pursuing civil, legal motion towards former execs (Aug 2020)
Tongaat Hulett confirms civil claims totalling R450m towards implicated former executives (Jan 2022)
In October final yr Tongaat introduced that it will enter enterprise rescue proceedings for 2 of its SA operations: Tongaat Hulett and Tongaat Hulett Development.
Hudson and his group had toiled since 2019 on a turnaround technique and made good progress in sure areas, noticeably in lowering debt from a excessive of R11.7 billion to R6.5 billion, although darker angels conspired to frustrate the restoration plan.
Covid, lockdowns, floods and riots in Kwazulu-Natal cruelly derailed a restoration that appeared to be on monitor till early 2020.
Late final yr we discovered that except the corporate finds R1.5 billion for working capital, it will not be capable to commerce by means of 2023.
At that time, management of the corporate successfully handed to the enterprise rescue practitioners (Trevor Murgatroyd, Peter van den Steen and Gerhard Albertyn), with Hudson and his group being made functionaries. Business rescue additionally places a court-sanctioned freeze on any creditor claims, permitting the corporate time to commerce its means again to solvency.
The enterprise rescue plan ought to have been revealed on 1 December 2022, however the practitioners requested collectors for an extension, first to 31 January 2023, after which once more to twenty-eight February. At the most recent rely, the corporate has greater than R8 billion in debt, whereas creditor claims are at present being verified.
The firm’s Botswana, Mozambique and Zimbabwe sugar operations aren’t financially distressed and proceed buying and selling usually. These companies are funded independently of Tongaat’s SA operations and are anticipated to be largely unaffected by enterprise rescue proceedings.
In December, the enterprise rescue practitioners (BRPs) introduced that the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) had superior submit graduation finance for working capital and off-crop upkeep and capital expenditure.
This would permit it to finish the present milling season, perform needed off-crop upkeep and capex and put together for the beginning the 2023/4 season.
The IDC’s position within the rescue of Tongaat seems to have been prompted largely by the outsized position the corporate performs within the SA financial system, with an estimated half a million individuals concerned in downstream sugar-dependent companies, together with transport and logistics.
‘Undesirable’ accounting practices
The PwC investigation in 2019 discovered ‘undesirable’ accounting practices corresponding to untimely income recognition and bills being capitalised as property. “This resulted in profits in the respective years being overstated, and in the overstatement of certain assets in (Tongaat’s) financial statements,” reads the report.
Investec Securities analyst Anthony Geard was first to odor a skunk in 2018, when he known as for then-CEO Staude to resign after racking up 10 years of unfavourable cumulative free-cash move and declining returns.
Around the identical time funding analyst David Woollam ran the spreadsheet numbers over 10 years and wondered aloud why a firm that reported cumulative after-tax earnings of R9 billion and paid dividends of R2.7 billion wanted to borrow a further R7.5 billion. Deduct the dividends and it begs the query: the place did the remaining R14 billion go?
- Some R8 billion went on capex, although the corporate was imprecise on particulars.
- Apart from a new mill and refinery in Mozambique costing maybe R800 million, we all know that no new mills had been in-built SA or Zimbabwe over the prior 10 years.
- Nor had been there noticeable expansions in farming operations or land acquisitions.
“A cynic might conclude that a substantial amount of otherwise normal operating expenses were somehow capitalised as fixed assets,” concluded Woollam.
Sugar cane property had been additionally reported to have elevated 173% over 10 years at a time when yields and sugar costs declined. There was a rise in hectares harvested, however nonetheless not sufficient to account for this huge improve in organic property.
Land gross sales had been additionally grossly overstated, one thing the complicated and judgment-inviting International Financial Reporting Standards (and their reliance on auditor judgment) appear to foster. IFRS 15, which units out tips for income recognition, says the dangers and rewards of possession should cross from the client to the vendor, and there should be a affordable assurance that cost shall be made earlier than income might be counted. Land gross sales are notoriously protracted and topic to all kinds of conditionalities, corresponding to zoning and funding approval. Many of the land offers in concluded between 2016 and 2019 seem to have been unwound.
Logan argues there appears to have been a change in tradition after Anglo bought its stake in Tongaat in 2009 for R4.2 billion.
“That gave the then-management free rein to create the kind of incentives that rewarded executives, rather than shareholders,” says Logan.
“It was those incentives that created such massive accounting fraud in the group, where revenue was over-stated and expenses were capitalised as assets,” he tells Moneyweb.
Adds Exness Africa market analyst Terence Hove: “On face worth it, Hudson’s departure appears to be a performance-related departure. However the commerce of sugar regionally has turn out to be fairly troublesome enterprise terrain to maneuverer.
“Runaway costs have been the biggest factor to address, but to do that in the current environment is difficult. The complex work streams that the business rescue practitioners have battled with, and [the fact that they have] subsequently requested to extend the deadline, are testament to this difficult environment.”
The BRPs need to minimize prices any means they will – and reducing out a CEO wage will definitely assist. Also on the chopping block are growth prices, pending the discharge of the enterprise rescue plan. Asset and enterprise gross sales are likewise into account.
With the BRPs now within the driving seat, it makes little sense for Hudson to stay on. He will go away it to others to complete the job he began.
Listen: SimplyOneLap founder Simon Brown on Tongaat Hulett’s CEO exiting, and Spar’s chair turning into its interim CEO (or learn the transcript)
You may hearken to this podcast on iono.fm here.