With discussions on imposing a wealth tax being rife in previous years, coverage makers are turning to the South African Revenue Service (Sars) to look into the feasibility of this new proposed tax, to bridge the ‘widest wealth gap in the world’.
This was seen this previous weekend throughout the ANC’s National Policy Conference, the place a wealth tax was tabled as the most popular choice to fund the fundamental earnings grant.
While the thought of a wealth tax was initially tabled years in the past, it turned a subject of broad dialogue upon launch of the wealth tax report by the Davis Tax Committee in March 2018.
Do the means justify the ends?
Fast ahead to the 2022 convention, and the chair of the ANC’s financial transformation subcommittee acknowledged that “The majority of the wealth of this country is in the hands of 5% of the population. That’s not right. We’ll have to have Sars look into [a wealth tax]”.
This assertion – geared toward wealth equalisation in South Africa, of which it seems the first step is the everlasting implementation of the fundamental earnings grant, as was used throughout the Covid-19 pandemic – is supported by a examine carried out by the University of the Witwatersrand.
In the examine, titled ‘Coronavirus: why South Africa needs a wealth tax now’, it was speculated that “a wealth tax on the richest 354 000 individuals could raise at least R143 billion”.
This might sound like an astronomical quantity, however it is simply the tip of the iceberg for the funds wanted to even remotely begin the wealth equalisation course of in South Africa.
Read:
Rise in emigration on the playing cards
One level of concern on the proposed wealth tax, is the exodus of the high-net-worth people who can be the topic of such tax, if imposed. The Bureau of Economic Research (BER) has acknowledged that the implementation of a wealth tax may even see shrinkage of an already small tax base in South Africa, with these rich people emigrating in favour of a decrease tax jurisdiction.
The BER goes additional, as supported by quite a lot of unbiased economists and up to date Intellidex stories, elevating the concern that ought to a wealth tax be carried out, it might be executed so at a excessive efficient tax price, because of the pool of people who qualify being so small.
Granted, the thought of a wealth tax is to regulate the monetary inequalities in South Africa; it is human nature to do what is finest for oneself. This consists of defending hard-earned cash towards a tax that may be construed as virtually punitive in nature, or no less than extra punitive than the present bracket system of taxation in South Africa.
The Davis Tax Committee’s balancing act
In its remaining report of the feasibility of a proposed wealth tax, the Davis Tax Committee, confirmed, by empirical proof, that the wealth inequality in South Africa is increased than even international wealth inequality.
It is noteworthy that point out was fabricated from the adversarial impacts of imposing a wealth tax,: “The adverse consequences of wealth taxation such as capital migration, disincentives to save, [and] the effect on entrepreneurship and employment must be thoroughly considered”. This would have a big affect on the already small South African tax base, with a knock-on affect of an elevated unemployment price for unskilled labourers, and a few professionals, sector dependant.
It has been advised by the Davis Tax Committee that though the objective behind the proposed web wealth tax is admirable, long-term sustainability should be thought-about. This signifies that the proposed tax system should be designed in such a option to not be deemed prohibitive on rich people, and never exacerbate emigration charges in any manner.
This will permit the proposed system, in the long term, to generate extra income than the prices to manage it.
The manner ahead
Although some research do present an ever-widening wealth hole in South Africa, and empirical proof confirming that South Africa has a wealth inequality increased than even the international wealth inequality, the nation’s tax base can stand no additional shrinkage.
A wealth tax could also be for the higher good, however the implementation should observe a staged and calculated method to advertise retention of contributing taxpayers, and stem the move of emigration in favour of extra digestible taxation.
It should be borne in thoughts, from a perspective of sustainability, that: “Wealth taxes are merely one tool, amongst many, with which to address the pressing problem of inequality,” as per the Davis Tax Committee, and shouldn’t be relied on in isolation.
Listen as Fifi Peters talks to BER chief economist Hugo Pienaar about what the proposed wealth tax means for the financial system (or learn the transcript right here):
Jashwin Baijoo, Legal Manager, Africa Tax and Compliance at Tax Consulting SA.
