Heated tobacco products have soared in recognition as a “smoke free” various to cigarettes lately, however a peer-reviewed report has urged their emissions could possibly be thought of smoke — a declare strongly rejected by the tobacco trade.
Heated tobacco products, or HTPs, are sometimes confused with e-cigarettes, which warmth liquid that may comprise nicotine however don’t contain tobacco leaf.
HTPs as an alternative use excessive warmth to decompose tobacco, through a course of referred to as pyrolysis, which doesn’t set it on hearth or burn it, due to this fact avoiding creating smoke.
The hottest and extensively obtainable HTP, Philip Morris International’s IQOS, is an digital system that heats a tobacco-filled, paper-wrapped, cigarette-like stick at a temperature of as much as 350 levels Celsius (662 levels Fahrenheit).
Last month a overview of the obtainable analysis by specialists in pyrolysis from Britain’s Nottingham University discovered “chemical evidence that IQOS emissions fit the definition of both an aerosol and smoke.”
The paper, printed within the American Chemical Society’s Omega journal, was funded by the STOP anti-tobacco initiative.
Its lead writer Clement Uguna mentioned that IQOS emissions comprise chemical compounds which are “in normal tobacco smoke, bush burning and wood smoke”.
ALSO READ: EU proposes to ban flavoured tobacco vaping products
“Hence smoke arises simply by heating organic substances and does not necessarily involve fire,” he instructed AFP.
The paper additionally discovered that earlier analysis on IQOS — nearly all of which has been funded by the tobacco trade — had in contrast a follow a typical cigarette.
However IQOS sticks are a lot smaller, containing round 200 milligrams of tobacco in comparison with 645 milligrams for the standard cigarette, it mentioned.
Because analysis by Philip Morris International (PMI) didn’t use a “like against like” comparability, it “underestimated” the degrees of dangerous and probably dangerous constituents (HPHCs) from IQOS, the overview added.
PMI mentioned the extent of HPHCs in IQOS emissions — per stick — was “reduced on average by 90-95 per cent compared to cigarette smoke”.
However that degree fell to 68 per cent when evaluating the tobacco content material of the 2 products, the Nottingham University specialists mentioned, calling for extra analysis.
‘Not smoke’: PMI –
PMI instructed AFP that the paper “misleadingly leverages pieces of the scientific assessment while omitting other important pieces of evidence”.
“Numerous international combustion experts and a number of government agencies have reviewed the same evidence package and concluded that the IQOS aerosol produced is not smoke,” it mentioned.
Reto Auer, a health care provider at Switzerland’s University of Bern who has beforehand researched heated tobacco, praised the Omega paper, telling AFP it was “one of the rare reports to dare to tackle the question of ‘smoke’ so deeply”.
Jamie Hartmann-Boyce of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at Oxford University, an writer of a extremely regarded overview on HTP science printed earlier this 12 months, mentioned the “important” paper “made some very good points”.
“I think mechanistically there are a lot of reasons to suspect HTPs might be more harmful than e-cigarettes and possibly less harmful than traditional cigarettes — but we really need more data,” she instructed AFP.
‘Difficult balance’ –
IQOS is obtainable in additional than 60 international locations underneath extensively various rules, and sticks are available in flavours akin to menthol, cherry and grape, which critics say assist appeal to youthful customers.
Last month the European Commission proposed banning flavoured HTP varieties after stick gross sales within the EU soared greater than 2,000 per cent — from 934 million to just about 20 billion — between 2018 and 2020.
PMI instructed AFP that the “proposal from the Commission is not underpinned by evidence”.
“It fails to prove, for instance, that flavours pose any additional health risks or that they attract a significant proportion of non-nicotine users,” it mentioned.
Hartmann-Boyce mentioned “there is every reason to be concerned about the extent to which the tobacco industry is manipulating the science and messages around new tobacco products.”
But she warned it was a “difficult balance” to speak the dangers of such products due to the overwhelming injury achieved by cigarettes. Tobacco kills half its customers, in keeping with the World Health Organization.
“If we say something is safer than cigarettes, that is not saying it’s safe — it’s like saying that this knife is safer than a loaded gun,” Hartmann-Boyce mentioned.