SANTIAGO, Chile (AP) — After voters in Chile rejected a progressive constitution that will have basically modified the nation, political leaders on Monday began engaged on discovering a path ahead to reform the present constitution which dates again to the dictatorship of Gen. Augusto Pinochet.
Rejection had been broadly anticipated in Sunday’s plebiscite, however the 24-point margin of victory for the rejection camp was a surprising repudiation of a doc that was three years within the making and crafted by a constitutional conference.
“What do Chileans want? We know what they don’t want, they don’t want this new proposed constitution,” stated Marta Lagos, head of MORI, a neighborhood polling firm. “We’re now searching for what they do want.”
The proposed doc, which might have amounted to one of many world’s most progressive constitutions, received a majority in solely eight of the nation’s 346 communes.
The streets of Santiago have been calm Monday and there have been barely any protests, proving fallacious predictions that these within the approval camp would turn violent in the event that they misplaced the plebiscite.
At authorities home, President Gabriel Boric met with the heads of the 2 chambers of congress to strive to work out a path ahead to amend the doc that dates again to the nation’s 1973-1990 navy dictatorship.
For months, analysts had stated that voters have been seemingly to see the plebiscite on the proposed constitution as a referendum on Boric, 36, who had been an enormous proponent of the doc.
In the ultimate vote, the 38% who voted in favor of the brand new constitution lined up just about identically with the approval ranking for Boric, Chile’s youngest president.
“It’s the first time I’ve seen anything like this,” Lagos stated. “This result transformed the government’s approval into votes.”
After the sit-down with Boric Monday morning, Sen. Álvaro Elizalde, the top of the Senate, stated that he and his counterpart within the decrease home, Raúl Soto, will name for conferences with Chile’s political events and social actions to begin a dialogue that may launch a brand new constitutional course of.
The conferences will search “to move forward toward a new constitution that will unite all Chileans,” Elizalde stated. “We hope to move quickly in this process, listening to the different views and proposals.”
The nation’s conservative leaders, who have been barely represented within the constitutional conference, now have the higher hand in doable negotiations.
“Those 24 points of difference gives the right a very clear margin for negotiation,” stated Cecilia Osorio, a professor at Chile University’s Government School. “They now have a margin to establish the rhythm of what follows and also the content of those proposals.”
What the method to write the brand new proposed constitution will appear like stays to be seen however analysts say some common outlines are clear for a brand new constitutional conference that may seemingly be smaller with political events taking part in a bigger position. The earlier conference was made up by a majority of political independents.
“The responsibility will fall mostly in the political elites that had been left out of the process and now once again will play a leading role,” Osorio stated.
Whatever doc the brand new conference comes up with can also be seemingly to be far much less formidable than the 388-article proposed constitution that characterised Chile as a plurinational state, would have established autonomous Indigenous territories, prioritized the setting and gender parity and launched rights to free training, well being care and housing, amongst different points.
“What we can aspire to now is a proposal that is much more moderate than the initial proposal that was rejected, a proposal with many more elements of continuity,” stated Claudia Heiss, a political scientist on the University of Chile. “Then the question will be to what degree this level of continuity with the current system is compatible to channel the discontent that was expressed in the social upheaval” of 2019.
The proposed constitution marked the climax of a three-year course of that started in 2019, when the nation exploded in student-led road protests sparked by a hike in public transportation costs that rapidly morphed into broader calls for for better equality and extra social protections.
The following yr, slightly below 80% of Chileans voted in favor of adjusting the constitution. Then in 2021, they elected delegates to a constitutional conference.
In retrospect, it’s doable “the explosion of 2019 was overinterpreted,” stated Eugenio Tironi, a Chilean sociologist. “It was a phenomenon of urban youth, and not the poorest. They were frustrated by expectations that were not met, rather than hunger, and that phenomenon was given a much more global connotation, believing that the whole population was behind that. I think that was a mistake.”
In distinction, political leaders paid little consideration to what Tironi characterizes as “the hangover” from that social revolt that amounted to a “reactivation of society’s conservative genes.”
Still, Tironi is optimistic the method can transfer ahead with sufficient velocity to guarantee there’s a new vote on a constitution by September of subsequent yr, which is able to mark the 50-year anniversary of the 1973 navy coup.
Talking in regards to the constitution has change into an “obsession” in Chile, Tironi says with amusing, “we’re all constitutional experts now and we’re convinced that the constitution will makes us happy or unhappy.”
——
Associated Press author Eva Vergara contributed to this report.
